The Wealth and Power of Augustus Caesar - The Richest Man That Ever Lived

The Wealth and Power of Augustus Caesar
The Richest Man That Ever Lived
 
Introduction

Gaius Octavius Thurinus, better known to history as Augustus Caesar, stands as one of the most transformative figures in Western civilization. Born on September 23, 63 BCE, in Rome to a prosperous but not patrician family, Augustus rose from the shadows of civil strife to forge the Roman Empire, ruling from 27 BCE until his death in 14 CE. His father, Gaius Octavius, a praetor and senator, died when young Octavius was only four, leaving him under the influence of his mother, Atia, niece of Julius Caesar. This familial connection would propel him into the maelstrom of Roman politics following Caesar's assassination in 44 BCE. Adopted posthumously as Caesar's heir, Octavius—soon to be Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus—navigated a labyrinth of alliances, betrayals, and battles to emerge as Rome's first emperor.

Augustus's story is not merely one of political acumen but of an intricate symbiosis between unparalleled wealth and absolute power. His fortune, estimated at $4.6 trillion in modern terms, dwarfed the treasuries of kings and pharaohs alike, stemming from inheritance, conquest, and shrewd economic control. This wealth was no idle hoard; it fueled his military machine, underwrote grand public works, and bought the loyalty that solidified his rule. In turn, his power amplified his riches, granting him dominion over provinces teeming with resources. This essay explores how Augustus's wealth and power intertwined to birth the Principate—a veiled autocracy masquerading as republican restoration—ushering in the Pax Romana, an era of relative peace and prosperity that lasted two centuries. By examining his early rise, consolidation of authority, military and economic reforms, and lavish expenditures, we uncover a man whose genius lay in making absolute rule appear benevolent and inevitable.
Head of Augustus
Image BBC R4

Early Life and the Foundations of Inheritance

Augustus's early years were marked by privilege tempered by fragility. Raised in the affluent suburb of Velitrae, he received an elite education in rhetoric and philosophy, accompanying Julius Caesar on campaigns in Spain and Africa by age 17. His frail health—plagued by illnesses that would recur throughout his life—belied a steely resolve. The turning point came in 44 BCE, when news of Caesar's murder reached him in Apollonia, Illyria. Caesar's will named the 18-year-old Octavius as primary heir, bequeathing him three-quarters of his vast estate, including properties across Italy and beyond. This inheritance thrust Octavius into a vortex of ambition and danger, but it also provided his first taste of immense wealth.

The scale of Caesar's fortune was staggering. As dictator, Julius had amassed riches through Gallic conquests, provincial tributes, and public contracts—estimated at hundreds of millions of sesterces. Octavius, now Octavian, inherited not just gold but political capital: Caesar's name, his veteran legions, and a public expectation of bequests. Yet, Mark Antony, Caesar's co-consul, withheld the funds, forcing Octavian to liquidate personal assets to honor the 300 sesterces per citizen payout—a move that won him instant popularity but strained his resources. By 43 BCE, Octavian had rallied Caesar's troops, raised eight legions at his own expense, and marched on Rome, demanding senatorial rank. The Senate, fearing Antony, complied, granting him imperium (military command) and propraetorian status.

This early phase highlighted the nexus of wealth and power. Octavian's ability to fund armies and games—such as the lavish funeral games for Caesar in 43 BCE—secured soldierly oaths and plebeian cheers. Proscriptions followed: in alliance with Antony and Lepidus in the Second Triumvirate (November 43 BCE), they compiled death lists of 300 senators and 2,000 equestrians, confiscating estates worth billions in modern equivalents. Octavian's share ballooned his coffers, transforming him from heir to warlord. Ancient sources like Suetonius note his father's equestrian wealth, but it was these ruthless seizures that elevated him to oligarchic status. By 42 BCE, after avenging Caesar at Philippi, Octavian controlled Italy's heartland, its fertile lands, and slave markets—foundations for an empire built on expropriated opulence.

The Roman History: The Reign of Augustus
Get the book USA at https://amzn.to/46RxoQW
Get this book UK at https://amzn.to/3IwEQci
Augustus Caesar, the first emperor of Rome (27 BC-AD 14), brought peace and prosperity to his city after decades of savage civil war. This selection from Cassius Dio's Roman History gives the fullest description of that long struggle and ultimate triumph

Rise Through Civil Wars: Forging Power in Blood and Gold

The triumvirate's fragile pact unraveled amid territorial squabbles, but Octavian's cunning turned chaos into consolidation. Allocated the west (Italy, Gaul, Hispania), he faced Antony's eastern dominance and Lepidus's African claims. The Perusine War (41–40 BCE) against Lucius Antonius (Antony's brother) saw Octavian seize more lands, redistributing them to veterans—a policy blending largesse with loyalty. The Treaty of Brundisium (40 BCE) and renewal of the triumvirate (37 BCE) bought time, but tensions peaked over Antony's liaison with Cleopatra VII of Egypt.

Octavian's propaganda machine, fueled by wealth, painted Antony as a debauched Oriental puppet. In 32 BCE, he "discovered" Antony's will in the Temple of Vesta, alleging bequeathals to Cleopatra's children— a fabrication that rallied the Senate to declare war. The Battle of Actium (31 BCE) was decisive: Octavian's fleet, commanded by Agrippa, crushed Antony's, netting spoils including Egypt's treasury. This conquest was pivotal. Egypt, Rome's breadbasket, yielded annual grain taxes of 6 million medimni, plus gold mines, papyrus, and trade routes. Augustus annexed it not as a province but as his personal domain, administered by equestrian prefects answerable only to him—effectively making him pharaoh in all but name.

The proscriptions and wars amassed further riches. Confiscated villas, vineyards, and mines poured sesterces into his coffers; by 29 BCE, he could boast closing the temple doors of Janus thrice, symbolizing peace funded by plunder. Suetonius records his distribution of 400 sesterces per soldier post-Actium, a bribe that ensured fealty. Power, meanwhile, accrued through titles: consul five times by 27 BCE, he manipulated elections and senatorial decrees. His auctoritas—personal prestige—stemmed from this war chest, allowing him to patronize poets like Virgil, whose Aeneid mythologized his Julian lineage. Thus, civil strife not only elevated his power but engorged his wealth, turning Rome's elite into his clients.

The Principate: Veiling Autocracy in Republican Garb

By 27 BCE, Octavian staged a masterful charade: feigning resignation of powers to the Senate, he received them back amplified as Augustus ("the revered one"). The First Settlement granted him proconsular imperium over key provinces for ten years, controlling 75% of legions. The Second Settlement (23 BCE) made these powers lifelong, adding tribunician sacrosanctity—veto rights and personal inviolability—without the office's burdens. As princeps senatus, he presided over debates; as censor, he purged disloyal senators, swelling his client network.

This Principate was power's elegant disguise. The Senate rubber-stamped decisions, while Augustus's moral legislation—banning adultery, promoting marriage—projected paternalism. His wealth underpinned this facade: donations to the aerarium (public treasury) in 23 BCE (170 million sesterces) and 16 BCE (further vast sums) masked his dominance as civic generosity. National Geographic underscores how his army halved from 60 to 28 legions, settled in colonies on confiscated lands, ensuring loyalty without overt tyranny. Power was thus decentralized in appearance—governors reported to him, but he deferred to "senatorial wisdom"—yet centralized in fact, with Egypt's revenues funding it all.

Military Might: The Sword Sheathed in Gold

Augustus's military reforms epitomized his blend of coercion and coin. Post-Actium, he professionalized the army: 28 legions (150,000 men) plus auxiliaries (130,000), salaried and pensioned via the aerarium militare (6 CE, 170 million sesterces endowment). The Praetorian Guard, 9 cohorts of elite troops quartered near Rome, guarded his person and intimidated foes. Loyalty was bought—discharge bonuses of 12,000 denarii per veteran, lands in Spain and Gaul.

Expansion secured resources: conquests in the Alps (15 BCE), Illyricum (12–9 BCE), and Africa added mines and taxes. The Parthian "victory" (20 BCE) recovered standards without war, a diplomatic coup celebrated on the Augustus of Prima Porta statue. Yet, the Teutoburg disaster (9 CE) halted Germanic ambitions, prompting defensive frontiers. His power rested on this force, but wealth sustained it—personal funds covered shortfalls, as in the 44 BCE veteran payouts.
Augustus as a younger Octavian dated c.30BC
Capitoline Museums Rome
Image Wikipedia

Economic Mastery: Reforms and the Engine of Empire

Augustus's economic genius lay in systematizing Rome's finances. He replaced tax-farming with salaried collectors, conducting censuses (28 BCE: 4 million citizens) for equitable levies—5% inheritance tax on non-kin, 1% sales tax. Provinces paid fixed quotas, boosting revenue from 650 million to over 800 million sesterces annually. Egypt's annexation was transformative: its grain fed Rome, while Nile gold and trade (spices, ivory) swelled his patrimony.

Infrastructure boomed: 80,000 km of roads, the cursus publicus courier system, aqueducts like Aqua Claudia. He standardized coinage, stabilizing inflation. These reforms, per Wikipedia, derived from his provincial imperium, turning conquered wealth into imperial glue.

Personal Fortune and Lavish Expenditures

Augustus's wealth peaked post-Egypt: owning one-fifth of Rome's arable land, plus mines and estates, his net worth equated to 25% of the empire's GDP—$4.6 trillion today. He used it strategically: 100 million sesterces for the Temple of Mars Ultor (2 BCE), forums, theaters. Conquests like Naulochus (36 BCE) yielded 30,000 talents. Distributions—300 sesterces per citizen thrice—cemented popularity. Patronage funded Horace and Livy, embedding his regime in culture. Upon death, he left 1 billion sesterces to the treasury, per Suetonius.

Legacy: The Augustan Synthesis

Augustus died on August 19, 14 CE, deified by a grieving Senate. His wealth and power birthed an empire spanning 5 million km², population 50 million. The Pax Romana flourished, but at autocracy's cost—successors inherited his template, for better or worse. In him, Rome found stability, gilded by gold and girded by guile.

The Twelve Caesars
Get this book USA at https://amzn.to/46qCbbO
Get the book UK at https://amzn.to/47NBax0
Suetonius served under Emperor Hadrian with access to the imperial archives. He knew where the bodies were buried. Literally. His "Lives of the Twelve Caesars" strips away the mythology to show these rulers as they really were!
 
 Follow Roman History on X @romanhistory1 or https://x.com/romanhistory1

Women of the Empire: The rise and fall of the women of the Julio-Claudian dynasty

Just Out - Order Now
Women of the Empire:
The rise and fall of the women of the Julio-Claudian dynasty
Get the Kindle UK at https://amzn.to/3HSJ3GW
Get this book UK at https://amzn.to/47Ab0O8
Get the Kindle USA at https://amzn.to/4paIk4J
Get this book USA at https://amzn.to/4666ypj
From the shadows of the imperial palace to the crucible of dynastic ambition, Women of the Empire traces the tumultuous paths of Livia Drusilla, Julia the Elder, Agrippina the Elder, and Claudia Octavia.

Drawing on ancient sources and modern scholarship, this book examines the lives of these women with historical precision and psychological depth, casting new light on how they navigated a brutal world where power, family, and survival were inseparable.
 
About the author
 
Raven Kamali is a multi-genre author and poet based in Queensland, Australia. She writes both fiction and non-fiction, drawing on a diverse range of interests and experiences. She holds a degree in Ancient History and Latin, with a particular focus on the Roman Republic and the Julio-Claudian dynasty.
 
 
Follow Roman History on X @romanhistory1 or https://x.com/romanhistory1

Romulus Augustulus: The Last Emperor of the Western Roman Empire

Romulus Augustulus: The Last Emperor of the Western Roman Empire

Romulus Augustulus, often cited as the last Western Roman Emperor, holds a unique place in history as a figure symbolizing the fall of an empire that had dominated the Mediterranean world for centuries. His brief reign in 475–476 CE marked the symbolic end of the Western Roman Empire, a pivotal moment that ushered in the Middle Ages. Despite his historical significance, Romulus Augustulus was a mere teenager, a puppet ruler controlled by more powerful forces, and his reign was more a footnote than a period of significant governance. This essay explores the historical context of Romulus Augustulus’s reign, his life, the events leading to the fall of the Western Roman Empire, and his enduring legacy as a symbol of decline and transition.
Historical Context: The Decline of the Western Roman Empire To understand Romulus Augustulus’s reign, one must first grasp the broader context of the Western Roman Empire’s decline. By the 5th century CE, the Roman Empire had split into two distinct entities: the Western Roman Empire, centered in Ravenna (after Rome ceased to be the capital in 402 CE), and the Eastern Roman Empire, based in Constantinople. The Western Empire faced mounting pressures from internal decay and external threats, which set the stage for its collapse. The 4th and 5th centuries were marked by economic instability, political corruption, and military weakness. The empire’s economy suffered from heavy taxation, inflation, and a reliance on slave labor, which stifled innovation and agricultural productivity. The Roman military, once a formidable force, became increasingly dependent on barbarian mercenaries, as Roman citizens grew reluctant to serve. These mercenaries, often of Germanic or Hunnic origin, were loyal to their own leaders rather than the empire, creating vulnerabilities. Barbarian invasions further exacerbated the empire’s woes. The Visigoths sacked Rome in 410 CE, a psychological blow to Roman prestige, and the Vandals captured North Africa, a critical grain-producing region, in the 430s. The Huns, under Attila, ravaged Europe in the 440s and 450s, further destabilizing the Western Empire. Meanwhile, internal power struggles saw emperors rise and fall with alarming frequency, often through assassination or coups. Between 455 and 475 CE, the Western Empire saw a rapid succession of emperors, many of whom were puppets controlled by powerful generals or barbarian leaders.
By the time Romulus Augustulus ascended to the throne, the Western Roman Empire was a shadow of its former self. Its territory had shrunk dramatically, with Britain, Gaul, Spain, and North Africa either lost or under tenuous control. Ravenna, the imperial capital, was surrounded by barbarian-controlled territories, and the empire’s survival depended on the whims of Germanic warlords.
Romulus Augustus - Solidus - Rome mint
He was the last emperor to rule over the Western Empire
Image: wildwinds.com

Romulus Augustulus: Origins and Rise to Power Romulus Augustulus, born around 460 CE, was a product of this chaotic era. His full name is uncertain, but he is commonly referred to as Romulus Augustus, with “Augustulus” being a diminutive nickname meaning “little Augustus,” likely coined by his detractors to mock his youth and lack of authority. His father, Flavius Orestes, was a Roman general of Pannonian descent who had served under Attila the Hun before joining the Roman administration. Orestes was a key figure in the late Western Empire, holding significant influence as a military commander. In 475 CE, the Western Roman Emperor was Julius Nepos, a ruler appointed by the Eastern Roman Emperor Leo I. Nepos, however, struggled to maintain control over Italy, where barbarian mercenaries and local elites held significant power. Orestes, seizing the opportunity, led a revolt against Nepos in August 475. With the support of Germanic troops, Orestes deposed Nepos, who fled to Dalmatia, and proclaimed his young son Romulus as emperor on October 31, 475. Romulus, likely no older than 15, was a figurehead from the outset. Orestes held the real power, serving as magister militum (master of soldiers) and effectively ruling the empire. The choice of Romulus as emperor was symbolic, evoking the names of Romulus, the legendary founder of Rome, and Augustus, the first Roman emperor. However, this symbolism could not mask the reality of Romulus’s powerlessness or the empire’s dire state. The Reign of Romulus Augustulus Romulus Augustulus’s reign, lasting from October 475 to September 476, was brief and uneventful. Historical sources from the period, including the works of Procopius, Jordanes, and the Anonymus Valesianus, provide sparse details about his rule, reflecting his lack of agency. As emperor, Romulus issued coins bearing his image, a standard practice to legitimize his authority, but these coins were minted in limited quantities and circulated primarily in Italy. The iconography on these coins depicted Romulus as a traditional Roman emperor, but such propaganda could not obscure the empire’s collapse. The Western Roman Empire under Romulus was little more than a rump state. Its effective control was limited to Italy, and even there, authority was contested by barbarian groups, particularly the Heruli, Rugii, and Scirians, who formed the backbone of the Roman army in Italy. These groups were led by Odoacer, a Germanic warlord of uncertain tribal origin, who would play a pivotal role in Romulus’s downfall.Orestes, as the power behind the throne, faced immediate challenges. The barbarian troops demanded land in Italy as payment for their service, a common practice in the late empire.  Orestes, however, refused to grant these demands, likely due to the scarcity of available land and the need to maintain Roman control over what little territory remained. This refusal alienated the troops, who turned to Odoacer for leadership.
In August 476, Odoacer rebelled against Orestes, capturing and executing him in Piacenza. On September 4, 476, Odoacer marched on Ravenna, deposed Romulus Augustulus, and declared himself King of Italy. This event is traditionally marked as the fall of the Western Roman Empire, though the transition was less dramatic than later historians portrayed. Odoacer spared Romulus’s life, likely due to his youth and lack of political significance, and exiled him to Campania, where he was granted a pension and allowed to live in obscurity. The Fall of the Western Roman Empire
The deposition of Romulus Augustulus is often cited as the end of the Western Roman Empire, but the reality is more complex. The empire had been in decline for centuries, and Romulus’s fall was merely the culmination of a long process. Several factors contributed to the empire’s collapse: 
  1. Barbarian Integration and Autonomy: The Western Empire’s reliance on barbarian mercenaries blurred the lines between Roman and non-Roman. Leaders like Odoacer were not external invaders but products of the empire’s own military system. Odoacer’s declaration as King of Italy was less a conquest than a reorganization of power within the empire’s framework.
  2. Eastern Roman Influence: The Eastern Roman Empire, under Emperor Zeno, continued to exert nominal authority over the West. Julius Nepos, still recognized as the legitimate Western emperor by the East, ruled in exile in Dalmatia until his death in 480. Odoacer, after deposing Romulus, nominally acknowledged Zeno’s authority, sending the imperial regalia to Constantinople as a gesture of submission. This act symbolized the end of the Western imperial office, as Zeno declared that one emperor was sufficient for the Roman world.
  3. Administrative Collapse: The Western Empire’s administrative structures had eroded significantly by 476. Tax collection, infrastructure maintenance, and centralized governance were no longer viable, leaving local elites and barbarian leaders to fill the power vacuum.
  4. Cultural and Symbolic Continuity: While 476 is a convenient marker for the fall of the West, Roman institutions, law, and culture persisted in Italy under Odoacer and later the Ostrogoths. The Roman Senate continued to function, and Roman law governed much of daily life, suggesting a transformation rather than an abrupt end
Romulus Augustulus’s Fate and Legacy
After his deposition, Romulus Augustulus fades from the historical record, but some accounts provide glimpses of his later life. According to the Anonymus Valesianus, Odoacer exiled Romulus to the Villa Lucullus in Campania, a luxurious estate near Naples. He was granted an annual pension of 6,000 solidi, a generous sum that allowed him to live comfortably. Some sources, such as a letter from the Ostrogothic king Theodoric, suggest that Romulus was still alive in the early 6th century, possibly living as a private citizen or monk. Beyond this, his fate remains uncertain, and no definitive record of his death exists.
Romulus’s legacy is less about his actions—given his brief and powerless reign—than his symbolic role as the last Western Roman Emperor. His name, combining Romulus and Augustus, encapsulates the irony of Rome’s history: a boy-emperor named after the city’s founder and its greatest ruler presided over its final moments. Historians like Edward Gibbon, in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, have used Romulus Augustulus as a poignant symbol of Rome’s collapse, though Gibbon and others emphasize that the empire’s fall was a gradual process rather than a single event. Interpretations and Historical Significance The significance of Romulus Augustulus lies in what his reign represents rather than what he achieved. His deposition in 476 is a convenient endpoint for historians, but it was not seen as catastrophic at the time. Contemporaries like Procopius and Jordanes viewed the transition to Odoacer’s rule as a continuation of Roman governance under a new title. The Eastern Roman Empire, which survived for another millennium as the Byzantine Empire, considered itself the true heir of Rome, further complicating the narrative of 476 as a definitive end.
Modern historians debate the causes and nature of the Western Empire’s fall. Some, like Peter Heather, argue that external pressures from barbarian invasions overwhelmed a weakened empire, while others, like Bryan Ward-Perkins, emphasize internal economic and social collapse. Romulus Augustulus, as a passive figure, embodies the empire’s inability to adapt to these challenges. His youth and lack of authority highlight the dysfunction of a system that could no longer produce effective leaders. In popular culture, Romulus Augustulus has been romanticized as a tragic figure, particularly in novels and films like The Last Legion (2007), which fictionalizes his life as an adventure of redemption. Such portrayals, while entertaining, bear little resemblance to the historical record, which paints him as a marginal figure in a collapsing world. Conclusion Romulus Augustulus’s brief reign marks the symbolic end of the Western Roman Empire, but his story is less about individual agency than the culmination of centuries of decline. A teenager thrust into a role he could not control, Romulus was a puppet emperor in a crumbling empire, overshadowed by powerful generals and barbarian warlords. His deposition in 476 by Odoacer was not a dramatic conquest but a quiet transition, reflecting the gradual erosion of Roman authority. Yet, his name and title carry a weight that resonates through history, evoking the grandeur and tragedy of Rome’s fall. As a historical figure, Romulus Augustulus serves as a poignant reminder of the fragility of empires and the complex interplay of internal and external forces that shape their destinies. Follow Roman History on X @romanhistory1 or https://x.com/romanhistory1